Hybrid simulation of brain–skull growth
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This paper describes a hybrid model that includes both a standard finite element model and also volume-preserving structural modeling for a clinical application involving skull development in infants, with particular application to craniostosis modeling. To accommodate the growing brain, the skull needs to grow quickly in the first few months of life, and most of the growth of the skull at that time occurs at the sutures. Craniosynostosis, which is a developmental abnormality, occurs when one or more sutures are fused early in life (even in utero) while the skull is growing, resulting in an abnormal skull shape. To study normal brain–skull growth and to develop a model of craniosynostosis, we have developed a hybrid computational model to simulate the relationship between the growing deformable brain and the rigid skull. Our model is composed of the nine segmented skull plates as rigid surfaces, deformable sutures, and a volumetrically controllable deformable brain. The Cranial Index (ratio of biparietal width to fronto-occipital length) is measured during the simulation, showing a characteristic peak during development. Measures of linear growth along each dimension show characteristic increases over time. The hybrid simulation framework shows promise to support further investigations into abnormal skull development. By varying the properties of the sutures in our model, we can now simulate different craniosynostosis models, such as scaphocephaly and trigonocephaly. In this paper, we show results on the evolution of the Cranial Index as calculated using standard landmarks and compare to the normal index, and thereby evaluate our model by comparing it with patient data.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".