MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2122301368 · doi:10.4043/13020-ms

The Terra Nova FPSO Turret Mooring System

2001· article· en· W2122301368 on OpenAlexaffabout
G.B. Howell, Arun S. Duggal, G.V. Lever

Bibliographic record

VenueOffshore Technology Conference · 2001
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicOffshore Engineering and Technologies
Canadian institutionsPetro-Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTurretNova (rocket)MooringMarine engineeringMeteorologyGeologyEngineeringAeronauticsGeographyMechanical engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract The Terra Nova FPSO consists of a new-build vessel with a disconnectable internal turret mooring system. Nineteen risers and umbilicals from four drill centers are connected to the turret with a maximum design throughput of 150,000 bopd. The turret system is designed to allow the vessel to quickly disconnect from its moorings and risers to avoid impact with unacceptably large icebergs, and to allow the FPSO to remain moored on station during the severe 100-year storm conditions. These unique requirements for Terra Nova have resulted in the development of one of the most sophisticated turret mooring systems to date. This paper presents some of the key drivers that led to the unique design of the Terra Nova turret mooring system, and provides a detailed description of the various components of the turret, focusing on both the structural and mechanical, and the fluid-transfer systems. The paper also provides an overview of the disconnection and reconnection of the turret mooring system, illustrating its compliance with the stringent requirements in the design basis. Finally the paper provides a summary of the turret design, fabrication and installation milestones over the life of the project. Introduction The Terra Nova FPSO will be located in approximately 95 meters water depth on the Grand Banks off the East Coast of Newfoundland, Canada. The harsh environment at the Terra Nova location is much like the northern North Sea with a 100- year significant wave height of 16 meters, and 1-hour mean wind speeds of 40 m/s. The FPSO is situated in "iceberg alley" where large icebergs from Greenland and Ellesmore Island drift south with the Labrador current. Surveys have shown the presence of iceberg scour marks on the seabed, and statistics indicate that the site could see as many as 66 large icebergs in a single season (April - July). Table 1 provides a summary of the design storm conditions for both the 1-year and 100-year return intervals. The Terra Nova FPSO system consists of a new-build FPSO vessel with a disconnectable internal turret mooring system. The turret supports 14 risers and 5 umbilicals servicing wellheads in four or more glory holes, with a maximum design throughput of 150,000 bopd. The turret mooring system has been designed to maintain station in the 100-year storm environment, and to be disconnectable to avoid an approaching iceberg on a collision course. Once the FPSO disconnects, the mooring and riser system is supported by the spider buoy that has an equilibrium depth of 35 meters below sea level. This paper provides a detailed description of the unique turret mooring system designed by FMC SOFEC Floating Systems for the Terra Nova FPSO, focusing on both the structural and mechanical system, and the fluid-transfer system. The paper also provides a description of the disconnection and reconnection of the turret mooring system, and the design, fabrication and installation milestones over the life of the project.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.070
Threshold uncertainty score0.139

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0080.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.206
Teacher spread0.192 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations15
Published2001
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueOffshore Technology ConferenceSame topicOffshore Engineering and TechnologiesFrench-language works237,207