Weighted projective spaces and iterated Thom spaces
Bibliographic record
Abstract
For any weight vector χ of positive integers, the weighted projective space P(χ) is a projective toric variety, and has orbifold singularities in every case other than standard projective space. Our principal aim is to study the algebraic topology of P(χ), paying particular attention to its localisation at individual primes p. We identify certain p-primary weight vectors π for which P(π) is homeomorphic to an iterated Thom space, and discuss how any weighted projective space may be reassembled from its p-primary parts. The resulting Thom isomorphisms provide an alternative to Kawasaki's calculation of the cohomology ring of P(χ), and allow us to recover Al Amrani's extension to complex K-theory. Our methods generalise to arbitrary complex oriented cohomology algebras and their dual homology coalgebras, as we demonstrate for complex cobordism theory, the universal example. In particular, we describe a fundamental class that belongs to the complex bordism coalgebra of P(χ), and may be interpreted as a resolution of singularities.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.004 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.006 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".