The Role of Goal Orientation and Self-Efficacy in Learning from Web-Based Worked Examples
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The goal of this study was to understand the roles of goal ori entation and self-efficacy when learning from worked exam ples. A Web-based learning environment, used as a compo nent of a traditional undergraduate chemistry course, served as the context for the study. Goal orientations were derived from Elliot and McGregor’s (2001) achievement goals frame work. Structural equation modeling was applied to measures of individual goal orientation, self-efficacy, use of online worked examples and achievement (N=176). Results indicate that a mastery-approach orientation was the strongest predic tor of achievement, but worked example use and self-effica cy were not related to either of the mastery orientations. For the performance orientations, worked example use was estab lished as an antecedent to self-efficacy and achievement. Results are discussed in terms of goal theory and its applica tion to the design of instructional materials.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.004 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it