MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

EDFA-Based All-Optical Relaying in Free-Space Optical Systems

2012· article· en· W2122539785 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Communications · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicOptical Wireless Communication Technologies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceElectronic engineeringAttenuationOptical amplifierOptical wirelessOptical performance monitoringFree-space optical communicationTransmission (telecommunications)Optical communicationOptical communications repeaterOptical engineeringFadingWirelessOptical fiberWavelength-division multiplexingChannel (broadcasting)Optical attenuatorTelecommunicationsEngineeringLaserMulti-mode optical fiberOpticsWavelengthPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Free-space optical (FSO) communication has recently gained a lot of interest for last-mile terrestrial applications. Some of its advantages include high data rates, ease of deployment, license-free operation, and high security. However, the weather-dependent optical wireless channel introduces attenuation and intensity variations known as scintillation which impose severe challenges for reliable data transmission. The distance dependence of both attenuation and scintillation motivates the use of relays as a means of improving the system performance and extending the range of communication. In this paper, we advocate the use of all-optical relays equipped with erbium-doped fiber amplifiers (EDFAs), which, in contrast to conventional FSO relays with electrical amplification, avoid optical-to-electrical and electrical-to-optical conversions. We develop accurate signal and noise models for fixed and variable gain all-optical and electrical relaying which include the effects of all relevant system parameters and types of noise. For performance evaluation, we analyze the outage probability of all-optical relaying in lognormal fading for dual-hop and multi-hop transmission. Our results show that all-optical relays, while simpler from an implementation point of view, outperform electrical relays unless the number of relays is very large. Moreover, for a fixed source-destination distance, performance improves as the number of hops (relays) increases up to a certain point beyond which adding more hops deteriorates performance.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.943
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0020.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.043
GPT teacher head0.270
Teacher spread0.228 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it