MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2122554472 · doi:10.1109/twc.2008.080798

PHY-aware distributed scheduling for ad hoc communications with physical interference model

2009· article· en· W2122554472 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced Wireless Network Optimization
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceScheduling (production processes)PHYComputer networkFadingWireless ad hoc networkChannel (broadcasting)ThroughputStochastic geometryCode rateDistributed computingPhysical layerWirelessDecoding methodsAlgorithmMathematical optimizationTelecommunicationsMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We consider a random-access-based ad hoc network, where different links use mini-slots to contend for the channel, and then successful links transmit data packets, as in CSMA. The focus of our study is to develop optimal strategies for physicallayer- aware (PHY-aware) distributed scheduling, which involves a joint process of channel probing and distributed scheduling. Because of channel fading and cochannel interference, the signalto- interference-plus-noise-ratio (SINR) across links is highly dynamic and can exhibit significant variation. In the low SINR case, further channel probing is likely to lead to better SINR conditions and hence yield higher throughput. The desired tradeoff boils down to judiciously choosing the optimal stopping strategy for channel probing before data transmissions. In this paper, we investigate PHY-aware distributed scheduling, aiming to maximize the overall network throughput. The problem under consideration is inherently challenging: 1) multiple links can transmit successfully simultaneously and the number of simultaneously transmitting links is random; and 2) the network throughput is the sum rate of all transmitting links, but each link involved in the transmission has no knowledge of the instantaneous rates of other links, and the stopping decision is made in a distributed manner based on local information only. We use optimal stopping theory to tackle this challenge, and show that the optimal policy for distributed scheduling has a threshold structure. Accordingly, after a channel probing, a link would proceed with data transmissions only if a function of its instantaneous rate is greater than the optimal rate threshold. Observing that the network throughput depends heavily on the contention probability of each link, we generalize the study to jointly optimize the rate threshold and the contention probability, and propose a two-stage algorithm for computing the pair of optimal rate threshold and contention probability by using fractional optimization and geometric programming.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.891
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.029
GPT teacher head0.275
Teacher spread0.246 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it