MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2122597238 · doi:10.1109/tpwrs.2009.2036264

A Stochastic Programming Model for a Day-Ahead Electricity Market With Real-Time Reserve Shortage Pricing

2010· article· en· W2122597238 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Power Systems · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicElectric Power System Optimization
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMathematical optimizationElectricity pricingElectricityScheduling (production processes)Electricity marketComputationComputer sciencePower system simulationEconomic shortageInteger programmingStochastic programmingHeuristicTime limitElectric power systemLimit (mathematics)Operations researchEconomicsPower (physics)EngineeringMathematicsAlgorithm

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We present a multi-period stochastic mixed integer programming model for power generation scheduling in a day-ahead electricity market. The model considers various scenarios and integrates the idea of reserve shortage pricing in real time. Instead of including all the possible scenarios, we parsimoniously select a certain number of scenarios to limit the size of the model. As realistic size models are still intractable for exact methods, we propose a heuristic solution methodology based on scenario-rolling that is capable of finding good quality feasible solutions within reasonable computation time.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.980
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.213
Teacher spread0.205 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it