MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Islam Came to South East Asia From China:Evidence from Traditional Chinese Roof Design in Kampung Laut's Old Mosque, Malaysia

2010· article· en· W2122613449 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Ahmad Sanusi Hassan

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian social science · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicArchitecture and Cultural Influences
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMalayIslamChinaIslamic architectureRoofArabicHumanitiesEast AsiaArgument (complex analysis)GeographyHistoryArtPhilosophyArchaeologyLinguistics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The objective of this study is to analyse influences of traditional Chinese roof construction elements to the roof design of Kampung Laut’s Old Mosque in Malaysia. The result of this study can be used as an evidence that Islam came to South East Asia (the Malay Archipelagos) from East (China) in contrast to the most arguments claimed that Islam came from West (India and Arabian region). This study conducts roof construction analysis on Kampung Laut’s Old Mosque (KLOM), which is the oldest mosque in Malaysia. There are several historical studies already shows evidences to support this argument. This argument however will be supported through architectural study. The study on the roof design elements are made in the literature study. The analysis finds that KLOM has principle roof construction elements influenced by Chinese architecture but if compared to its details on construction elements, this analysis finds that there are differences between KLOM and the traditional Chinese buildings. Keywords: Roof design; Chinese; Malay; Kampung Laut’s Old Mosque; ConstructionResume: L'objectif de cette etude est d'analyser les influences des elements de la construction de toit traditional chinois sur la conception du toit de la vieille mosquee de Kampung Laut en Malaisie. Le resultat de cette etude peuvent etre utilise comme une preuve que l'islam est venu en Asie du sud-est (les archipels malais) de l'Est (la Chine) contrairement a la plupart des arguments affirmant que l'Islam est venu de l'Ouest (l'Inde et la region arabe). Cette etude procede a une analyse de la construction de toit de la vieille mosquee de Kampung Laut (VMKL), qui est la plus ancienne mosquee de la Malaisie. Il existe plusieurs etudes historiques qui ont deja montre des preuves en tant que l'appui de cet argument. Cet argument, toutefois, sera soutenu par l'etude architecturale. L'etude sur les elements de la conception de toit est faite dans l'etude litteraire. L'analyse conclut que les elements principaux de la construction de toit de VMKL sont influences par l'architecture chinoise, mais si on compare les details des elements de construction, on peut trouver qu'il existe des differences entre VMKL et les bâtiments traditionnels chinois.Mots-cles: conception de toit; chinois; malais; vieille mosquee de Kampung Laut; construction

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.035
Threshold uncertainty score0.070

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.035
GPT teacher head0.233
Teacher spread0.199 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian social scienceSame topicArchitecture and Cultural InfluencesFrench-language works237,207