MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2122844901 · doi:10.2514/6.2005-6447

A New Satellite Attitude State Estimation Algorithm Using Quaternion Neural Networks

2005· article· en· W2122844901 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueAIAA Guidance, Navigation, and Control Conference and Exhibit · 2005
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicInertial Sensor and Navigation
Canadian institutionsUniversité de Sherbrooke
Fundersnot available
KeywordsQuaternionComputer scienceArtificial neural networkSatelliteEstimationAlgorithmState (computer science)Artificial intelligenceMathematicsEngineeringAerospace engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Satellite attitude control based on state feedback techniques requires measurement of all the state variables describing the attitude dynamics. The Extended Kalman Filter (EKF) has been used for this task, and works quite well in the general cases. However, the EKF is computationally intensive and requires a significant design effort due to mathematical modeling, linearization and its quaternion-motion version requires the use of two different attitude models a . A number of estimation techniques based on neural networks have shown to be more accurate than the EKF, but none of them seem to have been applied to satellite attitude or to quaternion motion. In this paper, a neural networks based satellite attitude estimation algorithm is presented. The proposed approach is original by using a quaternion neural network. It also presents a new way of integrating the neural network into the state estimator and develops a training procedure which is easy to implement. The suggested algorithm is shown to provide the same accuracy as the EKF with significantly lower computational complexity.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.854
Threshold uncertainty score0.913

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.224
Teacher spread0.216 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it