MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2122927176 · doi:10.1109/tdei.2006.1624271

Effect of insulator diameter on AC flashover voltage of an ice-covered insulator string

2006· article· en· W2122927176 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Dielectrics and Electrical Insulation · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicHigh voltage insulation and dielectric phenomena
Canadian institutionsNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaHydro-QuébecUniversité du Québec à Chicoutimi
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaUniversité du Québec à Chicoutimi
KeywordsArc flashInsulator (electricity)Materials scienceVoltageComposite materialMechanicsElectrical engineeringEngineeringPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The effect of the diameter of an insulator covered with ice on its flashover voltage was investigated. The insulator diameter was simulated and varied by controlling the width of a layer of ice artificially accreted on a short string of 5 IEEE standard units. The 50% withstand voltage (V/sub 50/) was experimentally determined using the method described in IEC 60507. The results show that the V/sub 50/ decreases as the width of the ice layer increases. Moreover, a mathematical model for predicting the critical flashover voltage of ice-covered insulators is proposed, and is validated against the experimental results. The model is then applied to ice-covered industrial insulators with different diameters yielding good concordance between the results from the model and the experimental ones.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.077
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.237
Teacher spread0.230 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it