MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2123758179 · doi:10.1109/lcn.2011.6115195

Formal validation of the security properties of AMT's three-way handshake

2011· article· en· W2123758179 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicAdvanced Authentication Protocols Security
Canadian institutionsConcordia University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMulticastComputer scienceHandshakeComputer networkProtocol Independent MulticastGateway (web page)RelayXcastThe InternetIP multicastInter-domainPragmatic General MulticastSource-specific multicastDistributed computingOperating systemWorld Wide Web

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

AMT (Automatic IP Multicast without explicit Tunnels) is a specification that has been developed by the Internet Engineering Task Force to address the lack of multicast communication among isolated multicast-enabled sites or hosts, attached to a network with no local multicast support. AMT is designed to provide a mechanism for a migration path to a fully multicast-enabled backbone in the future. As part of a larger project using AMT to extend the reach of multicast sessions, we have performed formal validation of the three-way handshake process between an AMT gateway and its coupled AMT relay by modeling it using the AVISPA tools (Automated Validation of Internet Security Protocols and Applications). We have identified two security problems where an intruder can impersonate an AMT Relay or an AMT Gateway. Furthermore, an intruder can make use of this impersonation to disconnect valid sessions of other legitimate participants.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.840
Threshold uncertainty score0.178

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.047
GPT teacher head0.239
Teacher spread0.192 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it