MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2124089227

An Algorithm for the MaxMin Area Triangulation of a Convex Polygon

2003· article· en· W2124089227 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Conference on Computational Geometry · 2003
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicComputational Geometry and Mesh Generation
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Saskatchewan
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMinimum-weight triangulationPolygon (computer graphics)Convex polygonTriangulationPoint set triangulationMathematicsPitteway triangulationStar-shaped polygonPolygon coveringCombinatoricsRegular polygonDiagonalRectilinear polygonAlgorithmComputer scienceDelaunay triangulationSimple polygonConvex optimizationConvex setBowyer–Watson algorithmGeometry
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Given a convex polygon in the plane, we are interested in triangulations of its interior, i.e. maximal sets of nonintersecting diagonals that subdivide the interior of the polygon into triangles. The MaxMin area triangulation is the triangulation of the polygon that maximizes the area of the smallest area triangle in the triangulation. There exists a dynamic programming algorithm that computes the optimal triangulation with respect to a number of optimality criteria in Θ(n 3 ) time and Θ(n 2 ) space, [4]. We present an algorithm that constructs the MaxMin area triangulation of a convex polygon in O(n 2 log n log log n) time and O(n 2 ) space. The algorithm is based on the dynamic programming approach and uses a number of problem-specific geometric properties that are established within the paper.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.894
Threshold uncertainty score0.640

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.040
GPT teacher head0.272
Teacher spread0.232 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it