MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2124118687 · doi:10.1177/089124102237822

A Bulwark in a Busy World

2002· article· en· W2124118687 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Contemporary Ethnography · 2002
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicWork-Family Balance Challenges
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Lethbridge
Fundersnot available
KeywordsExpansiveEthnographyFace (sociological concept)SociologyWork (physics)Gender studiesSpace (punctuation)Social psychologyPsychologySocial science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This article examines the strategies male and female rural clergy use to limit professional demands and preserve time and space for their family life. Clergy like other professionals face expansive work demands that originate in the understanding of professions as a vocation and are based on a masculine organization of work. Data drawn from ethnographic interviews with twenty female and twenty male clergy suggest that these clergy use their families as a bulwark against expansive professional demands and define them as one of the few legitimate reasons for saying no to work. In doing so, they resist gendered underpinnings of the profession. Clergy accounts demonstrate how ordinary arrangements for time off (i.e., days off or vacation time) and formal methods of time management fall short of guaranteeing time for the family in this particular professional milieu. Gender differences in women's and men's strategies for protecting family time are also discussed.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.618
Threshold uncertainty score0.536

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.081
GPT teacher head0.318
Teacher spread0.237 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it