MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Queue-Aware Resource Allocation for Downlink OFDMA Cognitive Radio Networks

2010· article· en· W2124360491 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced MIMO Systems Optimization
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceHeuristicsCognitive radioResource allocationMathematical optimizationTransmitter power outputQueueTelecommunications linkComputer networkWirelessTransmitterChannel (broadcasting)MathematicsTelecommunications

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this paper we consider resource allocation for an OFDMA-based cognitive radio point-to-multipoint network with fixed users. Specifically, we assume that secondary users are allowed to transmit on any subchannel provided that the interference that is created to any primary users is below a critical threshold. We focus on the downlink. We formulate the joint subchannel, power and rate allocation problem in the context of finite queue backlogs with a total power constraint at the base station. Thus, users with small backlogs are only allocated sufficient resources to support their backlogs while users with large backlogs share the remaining resources in a fair and efficient fashion. Specifically, we formulate the problem as a max-min problem that is queue-aware, i.e., on a frame basis. We maximize the smallest rate of any user whose backlog cannot be fully transmitted. While the problem is a large non-linear integer program, we propose an iterative method that can solve it exactly as a sequence of linear integer programs, which provides a benchmark against which to compare fast heuristics. We consider two classes of heuristics. The first is an adaptation of a class of multi-step heuristics that decouples the power and rate allocation problem from the subchannel allocation and is commonly found in the literature. To make this class of heuristics more efficient we propose an additional (final) step. The second is a novel approach, called selective greedy, that does not perform any decoupling. We find that while the multi-step heuristic does well in the non-cognitive setting, this is not always the case in the cognitive setting and the second heuristic shows significant improvement at reduced complexity compared to the multi-step approach. Finally, we also study the influence of system parameters such as number of primary users and critical interference threshold on secondary network performance and provide some valuable insights on the operation of such systems.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.985
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.254
Teacher spread0.238 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it