MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2124571279 · doi:10.1109/icis.2007.87

Decontamination of Arbitrary Networks using a Team of Mobile Agents with Limited Visibility

2007· article· en· W2124571279 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicOptimization and Search Problems
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Ottawa
Fundersnot available
KeywordsNetwork topologyVisibilityComputer scienceComputer networkDistributed computingMobile computingMobile agentTopology (electrical circuits)Mathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this paper, we consider the problem of decontaminating synchronous networks with mobile agents using breadth-first- search (BFS) technique. We consider various networks with different number of home bases to study the relationship between the number of home bases and the mobile agents/steps required to decontaminate. Through experiments, we demonstrate that as the number of home bases increases, the number of mobile agents required decreases in all network topologies considered. We observed that as the number of home bases increases the number of steps taken to decontaminate the network also decreases. The overuse of mobile agents due to the BFS strategy increases with the decrease in the number of contaminated nodes. For synchronous networks, increasing the number of home bases has an impact on the number of mobile agents needed. In particular, we note that this translates to a reduced number of mobile agents required for certain number of home bases.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.575
Threshold uncertainty score0.188

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.290
Teacher spread0.268 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2007
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicOptimization and Search ProblemsFrench-language works237,207