A Stochastic Model for Highway Accident Predictions with Winter Data
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In this paper, we consider the problem of modeling and predicting highway accidents in the presence of randomly changing winter driving conditions. Unlike most accident prediction models in the literature, which are typically formulated in a static (e.g. regression models) or discrete time (e.g. time-series models) setting, we propose a continuoustime stochastic model to describe the relation between highway accidents and winter weather dynamics. We believe this to be a more natural way to describe discrete-event highway accidents that occur in continuous-time. In particular, the accident counting process is viewed as a non-homogeneous Poisson process (NHPP) with an intensity function that depends on a (Markovian) weather process. Such a model is known in the stochastic process literature as a Markovmodulated Poisson process (MMPP) and has been successfully applied to queuing and telecommunications problems. One main advantage of such an approach, is its ability to provide explicit closed-form prediction formulae for both weather and accidents over any future time horizon (i.e. short or long-term predictions). To illustrate the effectiveness of the proposed stochastic model, we study a large winter data set provided by Ministry of Transportation of Ontario (MTO) that includes motor vehicle accidents on Highway 401, the busiest highway in North America.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it