MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2124963041 · doi:10.1109/hpcs.2005.14

An Adaptive Generalized Scheduler for Grid Applications

2005· article· en· W2124963041 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicDistributed and Parallel Computing Systems
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Windsor
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceDistributed computingGridScheduling (production processes)WorkloadOverhead (engineering)Grid computingResource management (computing)Computer networkMathematical optimizationOperating system

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The compute resources of a grid resource-service provider may be distributed over a wide geographical area. If the resource-service provider is to use his resources effectively, in addition to the characteristics of the compute-nodes and the applications, the characteristics of the communication network must also be known. A generalized scheduler should be able to handle a diverse set of jobs, with arbitrary inter-dependencies among processes and arbitrary communication channel delays. On a grid, the scheduling algorithm should respond quickly to the changing workload and environmental conditions without causing much overhead. Hence it should be able to customize its strategy in accordance with the prevailing conditions. In this paper, the algorithm for an adaptive scheduler, which can be used to map a set of jobs, of wide diversity, to a dynamic set of nodes, with prior reservations, is being presented. The scheduler has been tested extensively.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.931
Threshold uncertainty score0.315

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.026
GPT teacher head0.287
Teacher spread0.262 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it