MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2124963041 · doi:10.1109/hpcs.2005.14

An Adaptive Generalized Scheduler for Grid Applications

2005· article· en· W2124963041 on OpenAlexaff
A. K. Aggarwal, R. D. Kent

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicDistributed and Parallel Computing Systems
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Windsor
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceDistributed computingGridScheduling (production processes)WorkloadOverhead (engineering)Grid computingResource management (computing)Computer networkMathematical optimizationOperating system

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The compute resources of a grid resource-service provider may be distributed over a wide geographical area. If the resource-service provider is to use his resources effectively, in addition to the characteristics of the compute-nodes and the applications, the characteristics of the communication network must also be known. A generalized scheduler should be able to handle a diverse set of jobs, with arbitrary inter-dependencies among processes and arbitrary communication channel delays. On a grid, the scheduling algorithm should respond quickly to the changing workload and environmental conditions without causing much overhead. Hence it should be able to customize its strategy in accordance with the prevailing conditions. In this paper, the algorithm for an adaptive scheduler, which can be used to map a set of jobs, of wide diversity, to a dynamic set of nodes, with prior reservations, is being presented. The scheduler has been tested extensively.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.009

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.026
GPT teacher head0.287
Teacher spread0.262 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations30
Published2005
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicDistributed and Parallel Computing SystemsFrench-language works237,207