MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Observations on Some Physical-Chemical Characteristics of River-Ice Breakup

2000· article· en· W2125272772 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Cold Regions Engineering · 2000
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicArctic and Antarctic ice dynamics
Canadian institutionsAboriginal Affairs Northern Dev Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBreakupSedimentHydrology (agriculture)Environmental sciencePlumeWater qualityGeologyGeomorphologyMeteorologyEcologyGeotechnical engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Northern river breakups are a spectacular process capable of modifying hydrological, geomorphological, and biological regimes. To begin an assessment of the physical and chemical characteristics associated with river-ice breakup, some exploratory field studies were initiated on the Liard River, a large northern river. The primary objective was to conduct time series measurements of basic water chemistry parameters, suspended sediment concentrations and size, and associated trace elements during the active breakup period. Results show that, although water quality characteristics such as pH and specific conductivity remained relatively constant, dissolved oxygen increased rapidly as breakup progressed and reached a level of supersaturation. Just before breakup, a plume of fine-grained sediment developed leading to very high peak suspended sediment concentrations that far exceeded those produced under equivalent open-water discharge. Concentrations of select trace metal paralleled the rise in suspended sediment.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.596
Threshold uncertainty score0.297

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.188
Teacher spread0.177 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it