Education-Work Relations: Theoretical Reference Points for a Research Domain
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In this article, the authors examine the various approaches apparent in the research domain of the relationship between education, work and employment. The aim is to identify the main differences between the approaches and to propose a number of hypotheses on the reasons for the development of these theoretical conceptions. Five different conceptualisations are discussed. The first views the relationship between economy and education in a structural sense in which economic situations correspond to states of educational development. The second approach is also structural but considers the effect of the political interests of the various stakeholders such as trade unions. The third approach explores the reciprocal influences between education and work to discover how education and training is shaped by work and the economy and conversely, how education contributes to the development of the labour market and organisations. The fourth approach sees the construction of the relationship between education and work through structuring symbolic forms and categories. The fifth approach focuses on the constructed character of the relationship between education and work, resulting from the negotiation and compromise between the stakeholders.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it