MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2125638337 · doi:10.1177/0954410011414991

Non-linear solution to the maximum height orbit transfer guidance problem

2011· article· en· W2125638337 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueProceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers Part G Journal of Aerospace Engineering · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicSpacecraft Dynamics and Control
Canadian institutionsMcMaster University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGravitational fieldSpacecraftThrustPerturbation (astronomy)Orbit (dynamics)MathematicsRendezvousControl variableApplied mathematicsControl theory (sociology)Mathematical analysisPhysicsComputer scienceClassical mechanicsAerospace engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

An optimal control solution to the highly non-linear problem of orbit transfer mission is achieved by using a newly proposed analytical perturbation technique. The problem is classified as a two-point boundary value problem in order to optimize a performance measure in a given time. Assuming a constant thrust operating in a given length of time, it is sought to find the thrust direction history of a transfer from a given initial orbit to the largest possible orbit. The system dynamical model is stated by regarding a variable mass spacecraft moving in the variable gravitational field of the Earth, based on the two-body problem. To assess the perturbation solution fidelity, a numerical solution based on the Gauss pseudospectral method has been employed. The main novelty of this work is in applying a new analytical solution strategy that is a combination of perturbation technique and backward integration to a highly non-linear problem in the calculus of variations approach.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.725
Threshold uncertainty score0.776

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.182
Teacher spread0.173 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it