Tire-reinforced earthfill. Part 2: Pull-out behaviour and reinforced slope design
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The disposal of scrap tires has become a major environmental concern. The reuse of scrap tires in the reinforcement of earth structures can provide an attractive solution in reducing the number of used tires disposed in overcrowded landfills. This paper, the second in a series of three papers, discusses the behaviour of slopes reinforced with scrap tires and proposes design recommendations. A mat-reinforced slope can either fail by pull-out of the reinforcement or due to rupture of the attachment tying the tires. A large number of pull-out tests were performed on whole tires and tires with one sidewall removed embedded in sand and cohesive backfill. The pull-out resistance of tire mat reinforcement was primarily governed by the effective shear strength of the soil, and therefore it can provide an efficient means of reinforcement. However, large displacements were required to fully mobilize the ultimate pull-out capacity which must be considered in design.Key words: pull-out tests, scrap tires, reinforced slope, performance, design guidelines.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it