MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2125862164 · doi:10.1080/10652460701712727

Some refined families of Jordan-type inequalities and their applications

2008· article· en· W2125862164 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.

Bibliographic record

VenueIntegral Transforms and Special Functions · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMathematics
TopicMathematical Inequalities and Applications
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Victoria
Fundersnot available
KeywordsInequalityMathematicsType (biology)Natural (archaeology)PolynomialRepresentation (politics)Algebra over a fieldOrder (exchange)Pure mathematicsCalculus (dental)GeographyPolitical scienceLawMathematical analysis

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract In this paper, the classical Jordan's inequality is studied once again, a new sharpened and generalized version of Jordan's inequality is given by means of polynomial representation, and the result thus derived is then used to obtain several substantially more refined inequalities of Jordan type. Finally, an application of the results presented in this paper toward the improvement of the Yang Le inequality is considered. Keywords: Jordan's inequalitypower seriespolynomial representationhigher-order derivativesYang Le inequalitygeneralizations and refinement of Jordan's inequality Acknowledgements The present investigation was supported, in part, by the Natural Science Foundation of the Fujian Province of the People's Republic of China under Grant S0650003 and, in part, by the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada under Grant OGP0007353.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.072
Threshold uncertainty score0.493

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.076
GPT teacher head0.293
Teacher spread0.217 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it