MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2126051929 · doi:10.1109/vetecs.2003.1207124

Load-aware on-demand routing (LAOR) protocol for mobile ad hoc networks

2004· article· en· W2126051929 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicMobile Ad Hoc Networks
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer networkComputer scienceAd hoc On-Demand Distance Vector RoutingOptimized Link State Routing ProtocolRouting protocolDynamic Source RoutingLink-state routing protocolWireless Routing ProtocolDistance-vector routing protocolDestination-Sequenced Distance Vector routingWireless ad hoc networkDistributed computingNetwork packetTelecommunicationsWireless

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Most current routing protocols for mobile ad hoc networks consider the shortest path with minimum hop counts at the optimal route. However, the minimum end-to-end delay from source to destination may not always be achieved through this shortest path. In this paper, we propose an efficient delay-based load-aware on-demand routing (D-LAOR) protocol, which determines the optimal path based on the estimated total path delay and the hop count. We demonstrate the effectiveness of D-LAOR by integrating it with the ad hoc on-demand distance vector (AODV) routing protocol. Simulation results obtained suing the ns-2 network simulation platform, show that D-LAOR scheme increases packet delivery fraction and decreases end-to-end delay by more than 10% in a moderate network scenario when compared with the original AODV ad the other LAOR protocols.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Protocol · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.803
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.289
Teacher spread0.270 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Quick stats

Citations68
Published2004
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicMobile Ad Hoc NetworksFrench-language works237,207