Dysregulation of WNT/CTNNB1 and PI3K/AKT signaling in testicular stromal cells causes granulosa cell tumor of the testis
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Synergistic effects of dysregulation of the WNT/CTNNB1 and phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase (PI3K)/AKT pathways are thought to be important for the development and progression of many forms of cancer, including the granulosa cell tumor of the ovary. Sustained WNT/CTNNB1 signaling in Sertoli cells causes testicular degeneration and the formation of foci of poorly differentiated stromal cells in the seminiferous tubules in mice. To test if concomitant dysregulation of the WNT/CTNNB1 and PI3K/AKT pathways could synergize to cause testicular cancer, Pten(tm1Hwu/tm1Hwu);Ctnnb1(tm1Mmt/+);Amhr2(tm3(cre)Bhr/+) mice that express a dominant, stable CTNNB1 mutant and lack the expression of phosphatase and tensin homolog (PTEN) in their Sertoli cells were generated. These mice developed aggressive testicular cancer with 100% penetrance by 5 weeks of age, and 44% of animals developed pulmonary metastases by 4 months, whereas Pten(tm1Hwu/tm1Hwu);Amhr2(tm3(cre)Bhr/+) controls were phenotypically normal. Surprisingly, the tumors could not be classified as Sertoli cell tumors, but rather bore histologic and ultrastructural characteristics of granulosa cell tumors of the testis (GCTT). Pten(tm1Hwu/tm1Hwu);Ctnnb1(tm1Mmt/+);Amhr2(tm3(cre)Bhr/+) testicular tumors did not express CYP17, CYP19, germ cell nuclear antigen, estrogen receptor 1 or progesterone receptor, but expressed the early granulosa cell markers WNT4 and FOXL2, confirming the diagnosis of GCTT. Immunohistochemical analyses of Pten(tm1Hwu/tm1Hwu);Ctnnb1(tm1Mmt/+);Amhr2(tm3(cre)Bhr/+) GCTT demonstrated a tumor marker profile similar to that reported in human GCTT. Immunoblotting analyses revealed high levels of phosphorylation of AKT and the PI3K/AKT signaling effector FOXO1A in Pten(tm1Hwu/tm1Hwu);Ctnnb1(tm1Mmt/+);Amhr2(tm3(cre)Bhr/+) GCTT, suggesting the involvement of FOXO1A in the mechanism of GCTT development. Together, these data provide the first insights into the molecular etiology of GCTT and the first animal model for the study of GCTT biology.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".