MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2126328815 · doi:10.1109/tec.2004.827715

Nonlinear Model Identification of Wind Turbine With a Neural Network

2004· article· en· W2126328815 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Energy Conversion · 2004
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicEnergy Load and Power Forecasting
Canadian institutionsUniversité du Québec à Trois-Rivières
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAnemometerWind speedTurbineWind powerControl theory (sociology)Artificial neural networkNonlinear systemStandard deviationComputer scienceEngineeringMeteorologyMathematicsStatisticsArtificial intelligencePhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A nonlinear model of wind turbine based on a neural network (NN) is described for the estimation of wind turbine output power. The proposed nonlinear model uses the wind speed average, the standard deviation and the past output power as input data. An anemometer with a sampling rate of one second provides the wind speed data. The NN identification process uses a 10-min average speed with its standard deviation. The typical local data collected in September 2000 is used for the training, while those of October 2000 are used to validate the model. The optimal NN configuration is found to be 8-5-1 (8 inputs, 5 neurons on the hidden layer, one neuron on the output layer). The estimated mean square errors for the wind turbine output power are less than 1%. A comparison between the NN model and the stochastic model mostly used in the wind power prediction is done. This work is a basic tool to estimate wind turbine energy production from the average wind speed.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.674
Threshold uncertainty score0.551

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.188
Teacher spread0.180 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it