MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2126387669 · doi:10.1190/geo2011-0379.1

Estimating source locations of unexploded ordnance using the multiple signal classification algorithm

2012· article· en· W2126387669 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueGeophysics · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicGeophysical Methods and Applications
Canadian institutionsQuest University CanadaUniversity of British ColumbiaUniversity of British Columbia Hospital
FundersStrategic Environmental Research and Development Program
KeywordsUnexploded ordnanceSignal subspaceOrthogonalityAlgorithmLinear subspaceComputer scienceSubspace topologyMathematicsNoise (video)Artificial intelligenceImage (mathematics)Remote sensing

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

ABSTRACT To extract intrinsic polarization parameters of a buried object from electromagnetic induction (EMI) responses, one has to first find its location. We developed an efficient method to find the approximate locations of multiple ordnance items using time domain electromagnetic data. The procedure was based upon the principle of multiple signal classification which exploits the orthogonality of signal and noise subspaces of multistatic EMI data. For an arbitrary multistatic array, we formulated transmitter-based and receiver-based imaging or steering vectorial operators that related with the left and right singular vectors of a multistatic response matrix. The operators were computed at potential source locations and are mapped onto the noise subspaces derived from data. A spatial metric function was therefore introduced to measure the magnitude of the projection. A 3D source imaging of the metric function could be obtained by evaluating all potential locations over a region of interest. In ideal cases, the perfect orthogonality between the computed signal subspace and measured noisy subspace can be achieved at or near a target location, and rendered an imaging peak at that location. Conversely, the peak image locations obtained from this technique were used as the indicators for where targets were most likely present. The number of targets could be estimated from the rank of the data matrix, provided there were a sufficient number of transmitters and receivers. In some instances the locations of multiple targets were imaged directly, but the procedure was enhanced by stripping the effect of a larger or shallower target from the image. The technique was evaluated using the test-stand and field data, and compared with the standard nonlinear inversion. The results showed that it has potential capability to accurately localize sources in EMI sensing.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.800
Threshold uncertainty score0.367

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.043
GPT teacher head0.277
Teacher spread0.233 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it