MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2126525546 · doi:10.1142/s0218195903001189

COLLISION DETECTION OPTIMIZATION IN A MULTI-PARTICLE SYSTEM

2003· article· en· W2126525546 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Computational Geometry & Applications · 2003
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicComputational Geometry and Mesh Generation
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaResearch Services, University of CalgaryUniversity of Calgary
KeywordsVoronoi diagramCollision detectionCollisionParticle systemEvent (particle physics)Computer scienceDiscrete event simulationMathematical optimizationParticle (ecology)AlgorithmMathematicsSimulationGeometryPhysicsComputer graphics (images)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Collision detection optimization in an event-driven simulation of a multi-particle system is one of the crucial tasks, determining the efficiency of the simulation. We present the event-driven simulation algorithm that employs dynamic computational geometry data structures as a tool for collision detection optimization (CDO). The first successful application of the dynamic generalized Voronoi diagram method for collision detection optimization in a system of moving particles is discussed. A comprehensive comparision of four kinetic data structures in d-dimensional space, performed in a framework of an event-driven simulation of a granular-type materials system, is supported by the experimental results.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.723
Threshold uncertainty score0.766

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.282
Teacher spread0.266 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it