MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2126591495 · doi:10.37236/563

Product and Puzzle Formulae for $GL_n$ Belkale-Kumar Coefficients

2011· article· en· W2126591495 on OpenAlexafffund
Allen Knutson, Kevin Purbhoo

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Electronic Journal of Combinatorics · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMathematics
TopicAdvanced Combinatorial Mathematics
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaNational Science Foundation
KeywordsMathematicsCombinatoricsProduct (mathematics)Flag (linear algebra)Dimension (graph theory)Structure constantsConstant (computer programming)Cohomology ringCup productGeneralized flag varietyCohomologyPure mathematicsAlgebra over a fieldEquivariant cohomologyGeometryLie groupDe Rham cohomology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The Belkale-Kumar product on $H^*(G/P)$ is a degeneration of the usual cup product on the cohomology ring of a generalized flag manifold. In the case $G=GL_n$, it was used by N. Ressayre to determine the regular faces of the Littlewood-Richardson cone. We show that for $G/P$ a $(d-1)$-step flag manifold, each Belkale-Kumar structure constant is a product of $d\choose 2$ Littlewood-Richardson numbers, for which there are many formulae available, e.g. the puzzles of [Knutson-Tao '03]. This refines previously known factorizations into $d-1$ factors. We define a new family of puzzles to assemble these to give a direct combinatorial formula for Belkale-Kumar structure constants. These "BK-puzzles" are related to extremal honeycombs, as in [Knutson-Tao-Woodward '04]; using this relation we give another proof of Ressayre's result. Finally, we describe the regular faces of the Littlewood-Richardson cone on which the Littlewood-Richardson number is always $1$; they correspond to nonzero Belkale-Kumar coefficients on partial flag manifolds where every subquotient has dimension $1$ or $2$.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.013
Threshold uncertainty score0.044

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.003
Scholarly communication0.0020.006
Open science0.0020.003
Research integrity0.0010.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0130.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.051
GPT teacher head0.296
Teacher spread0.245 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations14
Published2011
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Electronic Journal of CombinatoricsSame topicAdvanced Combinatorial MathematicsFrench-language works237,207