MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2126621567 · doi:10.1109/20.877620

Design sensitivities for scattering-matrix calculation with tetrahedral edge elements

2000· article· en· W2126621567 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Magnetics · 2000
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicMicrowave Engineering and Waveguides
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsScatteringEnhanced Data Rates for GSM EvolutionTetrahedronMatrix (chemical analysis)Computer scienceMaterials scienceOpticsPhysicsGeometryMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The rates of change of the scattering matrix of a microwave device with respect to geometric or material parameters are of interest to designers, and useful in automatic optimization. They are most efficiently calculated by the adjoint variable method, but this usually entails the additional cost of funding the adjoint solutions. In the finite-element formulation presented here, no new solutions are needed beyond those required to calculate the complete scattering matrix. Explicit expressions are given for the calculation of the required matrix for a tetrahedral edge element. Results are presented for three rectangular waveguide problems: a uniform length terminated in a short-circuit; an H-plane miter bend; and a two-step waveguide impedance transformer.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.896
Threshold uncertainty score0.775

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.218
Teacher spread0.205 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it