MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2126633408 · doi:10.1109/vtcf.2006.497

Cell Dimensioning and Network Throughput in Cellular Multi-Hop Relay Networks

2006· article· en· W2126633408 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Vehicular Technology Conference · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicCooperative Communication and Network Coding
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSpectral efficiencyRelayComputer scienceDimensioningThroughputComputer networkOverhead (engineering)Physical layerHop (telecommunications)Interference (communication)Cellular networkElectronic engineeringEngineeringTelecommunicationsWirelessChannel (broadcasting)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this paper we look at the network throughput and efficiency of a cellular system employing multi-hop relaying. It is shown that multi-hop relaying can provide great improvement in the area averaged spectral efficiency (measured in bits/second/Hz per unit area of coverage) of a system. However, the number of relays introduced and the dimensions of coverage areas of relays must be carefully chosen for the specific propagation environment and system parameters, otherwise poorer efficiency may result. Some example designs for the 5 GHz unlicensed band are given to illustrate some design considerations. Realistic simulated throughput, considering physical and medium access control layer overhead, of a HiperMAN or 802.16 system together with noise and interference calculations are used to determine potential real-world performance of such systems. Calculations for one to four relay hops are presented and designs' area averaged spectral efficiencies are compared.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.722
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.235
Teacher spread0.216 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it