MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2126831583 · doi:10.1109/jsac.2008.080807

Multiple Frequency Offset Estimation for the Downlink of Coordinated MIMO Systems

2008· article· en· W2126831583 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced MIMO Systems Optimization
Canadian institutionsSimon Fraser University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCramér–Rao boundCarrier frequency offsetEstimatorComputer scienceTelecommunications linkBeamformingUpper and lower boundsAlgorithmSignal-to-noise ratio (imaging)Frequency offsetMIMOEstimation theoryMathematical optimizationStatisticsTelecommunicationsMathematicsOrthogonal frequency-division multiplexing

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We consider downlink MIMO beamforming from several coordinated basestations (BSs), and the associated problem of in dependent carrier frequency offsets (CFOs) at the BSs which cause accumulated phase errors to compromise beamforming accuracy. Correction of the CFOs requires estimation of their values, so our topic is multiple CFO estimation, a little-explored area. We present a robust and easily generalized estimator that accounts for the training sequence (TS) correlations caused by the CFOs, and show that it meets the Cramer-Rao lower bound (CRLB) at moderate signal-to-noise ratios (SNRs). The performance of the estimator is contingent upon TSs short enough to ensure convexity of the log-likelihood over the allowable CFO ranges. For combinations of TS length and CFO range that violate this constraint, we present two suboptimal estimators based on segmentation of the TS, both of which also meet the CRLB at moderate to high SNRs.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.943
Threshold uncertainty score0.478

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.034
GPT teacher head0.273
Teacher spread0.239 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it