A Robust Hybrid Intelligent Position/Force Control Scheme for Cooperative Manipulators
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
We examine in this paper the complex problem of simultaneous position and internal force control in multiple cooperative manipulator systems. This is done in the presence of unwanted parametric and modeling uncertainties as well as external disturbances. A decentralized adaptive hybrid intelligent control scheme is proposed here. The controller makes use of a multi-input multi-output fuzzy logic engine and a systematic online adaptation mechanism. Unlike conventional adaptive controllers, the proposed controller does not require a precise dynamical model of the system's dynamics. As a matter of fact, the controller can achieve its control objectives starting from partial or no a priori knowledge of the system's dynamics. The ability to incorporate the already acquired knowledge about the system's dynamics is among what distinguishes the proposed controller from its predecessor adaptive fuzzy controllers. Using a Lyapunov stability approach, the controller is proven to be robust in the face of varying intensity levels of the aforementioned uncertainties. The position and the internal force errors are also shown to asymptotically converge to zero under such conditions
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it