MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2127055690 · doi:10.1109/ccece.2007.311

A Distributed Trust Management Scheme in the Pervasive Computing Environment

2007· article· en· W2127055690 on OpenAlexaff
Tao Sun, Mieso K. Denko

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicAccess Control and Trust
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Guelph
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceUbiquitous computingOverhead (engineering)Trust management (information system)Distributed computingComputer securityAuthentication (law)Context-aware pervasive systemsScheme (mathematics)Autonomic computingEnd-user computingSoftware deploymentComputer networkCryptographySecure communicationUtility computingCloud computing securityCloud computing

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Pervasive computing allows a seamless interaction among users, devices, and applications, anytime and anywhere. Yet portable devices in pervasive computing are mainly powered by batteries and have limited computational and communication capability. Thus the open and dynamic environment in pervasive computing raises challenges in security and trust management. Without trust, pervasive devices cannot cooperate effectively, and the deployment of pervasive computing systems will be restricted to specific application scenarios. The traditional centralized security management schemes are not directly applicable in pervasive computing environments. Moreover, existing user authentication and access control schemes are inadequate to ensure security in pervasive computing. To overcome the limitation of centralized schemes, we need a distributed solution. In this paper, we propose a distributed trust management scheme to ensure security in pervasive computing environments. The main contributions of this paper are: (1) the employment of a simple, distributed trust computation and maintenance mechanism to reduce communication and computational overhead without compromising security; (2) the building of an aggregate trust metric that is based on direct observation and indirect observations obtained from neighbors' recommendations. The scheme gives more weight to direct observations and less weight to indirect observations. Every device computes and updates the trust value periodically in a distributed fashion. However, the exchange of trust information is carried out on demand to reduce communication overhead. The operation of the proposed scheme with varying parameter settings is illustrated, using an analytical approach.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.011
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.022

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.011
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.004
Open science0.0020.002
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.287
Teacher spread0.271 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations19
Published2007
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicAccess Control and TrustFrench-language works237,207