MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2127107265 · doi:10.1109/tap.2009.2016728

Microwave Biomedical Data Inversion Using the Finite-Difference Contrast Source Inversion Method

2009· article· en· W2127107265 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicMicrowave Imaging and Scattering Analysis
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Manitoba
FundersUniversity of Wisconsin-Madison
KeywordsSolverInversion (geology)AlgorithmMicrowave imagingIterative methodPerfectly matched layerFinite difference methodComputer scienceMicrowaveMathematical analysisMathematicsBoundary value problemMathematical optimizationGeology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We present a contrast source inversion (CSI) technique which is based on a finite-difference (FD) solver for use in microwave biomedical imaging. The algorithm is capable of inverting complex-permittivity biomedical data sets without the explicit use of a forward solver at each iteration. The FD solver is based in the frequency domain, utilizes perfectly matched layer (PML) boundary conditions, and the stiffness matrix is solved via an LU decomposition and Gaussian elimination. An important feature of the FD-CSI algorithm is that the stiffness matrix associated with the FD solver depends only upon the background medium and frequency, and thus the LU decomposition is only performed once, before the iterative inversion process. Unlike the usual integral equation (IE) based inversion techniques, the FD-CSI algorithm is readily capable of utilizing an arbitrary backarbitrary backgroundground medium for the inversion process.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.942
Threshold uncertainty score0.477

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.032
GPT teacher head0.262
Teacher spread0.230 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it