MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2127258367 · doi:10.1109/icdm.2002.1183901

A parameterless method for efficiently discovering clusters of arbitrary shape in large datasets

2003· article· en· W2127258367 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicAdvanced Clustering Algorithms Research
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCluster analysisComputer scienceCorrelation clusteringCURE data clustering algorithmsortSingle-linkage clusteringData miningCanopy clustering algorithmData stream clusteringSimilarity (geometry)Fuzzy clusteringArtificial intelligenceRange (aeronautics)ScalabilityPattern recognition (psychology)Database

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Clustering is the problem of grouping data based on similarity and consists of maximizing the intra-group similarity while minimizing the inter-group similarity. The problem Of clustering data sets is also known as unsupervised classification, since no class labels are given. However, all existing clustering algorithms require some parameters to steer the clustering process, such as the famous k for the number of expected clusters, which constitutes a supervision of a sort. We present in this paper a new, efficient, fast and scalable clustering algorithm that clusters over a range of resolutions and finds a potential optimum clustering without requiring any parameter input. Our experiments show that our algorithm outperforms most existing clustering algorithms in quality and speed for large data sets.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.851
Threshold uncertainty score0.530

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.028
GPT teacher head0.355
Teacher spread0.328 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Quick stats

Citations43
Published2003
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicAdvanced Clustering Algorithms ResearchFrench-language works237,207