MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2127288556 · doi:10.1177/1084822309331575

An Interdisciplinary Team for the Design and Integration of Assistive Robots in Health Care Applications

2009· article· en· W2127288556 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueHome Health Care Management & Practice · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldHealth Professions
TopicAssistive Technology in Communication and Mobility
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRobotGeneral partnershipHealth careKnowledge managementComputer scienceNursingEngineering ethicsEngineering managementHuman–computer interactionEngineeringMedicineBusinessArtificial intelligencePolitical science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The integration of assistive robots into the health sector requires an interdisciplinary team of researchers capable of studying and addressing issues that arise in human—robot interaction scenarios. In particular, current and future advancements in technologies demand a unique partnership between engineering and the health sciences to develop clinically relevant assistive robots. In this article, the authors discuss an interdisciplinary team approach for integration of assistive robots in health care applications. In particular, the objective of their interdisciplinary team is to design, integrate, and study socially assistive robots in the resident care practice in long-term care nursing facilities. The authors envision that the model they propose can be easily duplicated in other institutions around the world.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.912
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0020.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.060
GPT teacher head0.500
Teacher spread0.440 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it