MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2127453050 · doi:10.5539/ijps.v2n2p14

The Nature and Psychosocial Consequences of War Rape for Individuals and Communities

2010· article· en· W2127453050 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
venuePublished in a venue whose home country is Canada.

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Psychological Studies · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicGender, Security, and Conflict
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPsychologyEroticismObjectificationEleventhSocializationSpanish Civil WarContext (archaeology)CriminologyGender studiesSocial psychologySociologyPolitical scienceHistoryLawHuman sexuality

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Historically the rape of women during war can be traced back to the eleventh century with the occurrence of rapecontinuing into present day wars. Rape that occurs in the context of war has distinct features, consequences, andimplications for research and service providers. This article presents a critical examination of existing literatureon the nature and consequences of war rape through a socio-cultural and feminist lens. The paper argues thatpre-existing conditions of gender socialization, inequality, body objectification, and eroticism of violence evokesexualized violence during peace and give rise to rape as a tool during war. The individual and societalconsequences of wartime rape are examined through a synthesis of existing literature and considerations forprevention and intervention are presented.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.312
Threshold uncertainty score0.758

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.002
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.101
GPT teacher head0.453
Teacher spread0.352 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it