Calculating Mutual Inductance Between Circular Coils With Inclined Axes in Air
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In this paper we present a lucid, easy, and accurate approach for calculation of the mutual inductance between all inclined circular coils with either rectangular cross section or negligible section. We use Grover's formula for the mutual inductance between two filamentary circular coils with inclined axes that lie in the same plane. Their centers are either displaced along the axis of one coil or displaced along one axis of the first coil and then displaced sideways in addition. We apply the filament method for coil combinations comprising circular coils of rectangular cross section, thin wall solenoids, thin disk coils (pancakes), and filamentary circular coils. In this approach we clarify how Grover's formulas have to be used for different coil combinations in the filament treatment. Thus, two well-known methods (Grover's formulas and the filament method) can be easily used to calculate the mutual inductance between all inclined circular coils, even though the problem is purely three-dimensional.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it