MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2127807018 · doi:10.1109/tim.2009.2019312

Evaluation of Delays Induced by Foundation Fieldbus H1 Networks

2009· article· en· W2127807018 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicRadiation Effects in Electronics
Canadian institutionsWestern University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFieldbusFOUNDATION fieldbusFoundation Fieldbus H1Block (permutation group theory)Benchmark (surveying)WorkstationEngineeringControl systemComputer scienceControl theory (sociology)Control (management)Control engineeringElectrical engineeringMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The delays associated with the use of foundation fieldbus (FF) H1 networks within control loops are investigated in this paper. A Smar IF302 device, a Smar FI302 device, a DeltaV distributed control system (DCS), a Honeywell C300 DCS, and a National Instrument (NI) FF H1 workstation are used to implement test loops with the control-in-the-field architecture. Analytical and experimental evaluations are performed with a test loop using hardwired analog channels as a benchmark. Three segments of FF-H1-network-induced delays are identified, their analytical models are developed, and suggestions to potentially reduce the delays are provided. Furthermore, it is found that an unexpected additional delay of one macrocycle may be introduced, probably depending on whether the analog input (AI) block within the IF302 device is executed as scheduled. In conclusion, significant delays could be introduced if the traditional analog channels of a DCS are replaced by an FF H1 network.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.624
Threshold uncertainty score0.511

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.031
GPT teacher head0.260
Teacher spread0.228 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it