MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2127991665 · doi:10.1109/robot.1997.619315

Robustness and performance trade-offs in torque control of robots with harmonic drive transmission

2002· article· en· W2127991665 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicIterative Learning Control Systems
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRobustness (evolution)RobotControl theory (sociology)TorqueHarmonic driveControl engineeringAutomationModular designRoboticsRobust controlComputer scienceEngineeringControl systemControl (management)Artificial intelligence

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper focuses on designing torque control laws for robots equipped with harmonic drive transmissions. A nominal linear model of the joint is first identified from input-output experimental tests. Subsequently, by varying the input signal amplitude level, a set of models, incorporating the effect of nonlinearities in the system, can be extracted. The differences between the nominal model and this set are formulated as uncertainty bounds for control design purposes. Utilizing the uncertainty bounds, an H/sub /spl infin//-based optimal controller is designed. Experiments are performed for different uncertainty levels on the IRIS facility (a versatile, modular and reconfigurable prototype robot developed at the Robotics and Automation Laboratory of the University of Toronto).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.194
Threshold uncertainty score0.407

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.173
Teacher spread0.166 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2002
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicIterative Learning Control SystemsFrench-language works237,207