Adaptive Early Packet Filtering for Defending Firewalls Against DoS Attacks
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
A major threat to data networks is based on the fact that some traffic can be expensive to classify and filter as it will undergo a longer than average list of filtering rules before being rejected by the default deny rule. An attacker with some information about the access-control list (ACL) deployed at a firewall or an intrusion detection and prevention system (IDS/IPS) can craft packets that will have maximum cost. In this paper, we present a technique that is light weight, traffic-adaptive and can be deployed on top of any filtering mechanism to pre-filter unwanted expensive traffic. The technique utilizes Internet traffic characteristics coupled with a special carefully tuned representation of the policy to generate early defense policies. We use Boolean expressions built as binary decision diagrams (BDD) to represent relaxed versions of the policy that are faster to evaluate. Moreover, it is guaranteed that the technique will not add an overhead that will not be compensated by the gain in filtering time in the underlying filtering method. Evaluation has shown considerable savings to the overall filtering process, thus saving the firewall processing power and increasing overall throughput. Also, the overhead changes according to the traffic behavior, and can be tuned to guarantee its worst case time cost.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it