MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2128188853 · doi:10.1049/ip-com:20020306

Destination-initiating path restoration protocol for wavelength-routed WDM networks

2002· article· en· W2128188853 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueIEE Proceedings - Communications · 2002
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced Optical Network Technologies
Canadian institutionsQueen's University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer networkSurvivabilityComputer scienceBackupProvisioningNode (physics)Protocol (science)Path (computing)Wavelength-division multiplexingConnection (principal bundle)Transmission (telecommunications)Distributed computingTelecommunicationsEngineeringWavelengthMedicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Network survivability has been a crucial concern in wavelength-routed WDM networks. Due to the huge transmission capacity, a single network failure may cause a large amount of data loss, which would greatly degrade and even disrupt network services. In the paper, a destination-initiating path restoration protocol is proposed for surviving single-link failures in wavelength-routed WDM networks. Unlike existing path restoration protocols, the proposed protocol allows the destination node of a broken connection to initiate a connection restoration process. The objective is to reduce the connection restoration time so that a backup path can be provisioned rapidly for each broken connection that traverses a failed link. The major procedures of the protocol are described and its performance in terms of the connection restoration time is evaluated.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.902
Threshold uncertainty score0.931

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.065
GPT teacher head0.297
Teacher spread0.232 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it