Variational Probabilistic Speech Separation Using Microphone Arrays
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Separating multiple speech sources using a limited number of noisy sensor measurements presents a difficult problem, but one that is of great practical interest. Although previously introduced source separation methods [such as independent component analysis (ICA)] can be made to work in many situations, most of these methods fail when the sensors are very noisy or when the number of sources exceeds the number of sensors. Our approach to this problem is to combine the multiple sensor likelihoods [obtained using time-delay-of-arrival (TDOA) information] with a generative probability model of the sources. This model accounts for the power spectrum of each source using a mixture model, and accounts for the phase of each source using one discretized hidden phase variable for each frequency. Source separation is achieved by identifying the source vector configuration of maximum a posteriori probability, given all available information. An exhaustive search for the MAP configuration is computationally intractable, but we present an efficient variational technique that performs approximate probabilistic inference. For the problem of separating delayed additive noise corrupted speech mixtures, the algorithm is able to improve upon the signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) gain performance of existing state-of-the-art probabilistic and TDOA-based speech separation algorithms by over 10 dB. This significant performance improvement is obtained by combining the information utilized by these approaches intelligently under a representative probabilistic description of the speech production and mixing process. The method is capable of recovering high fidelity estimates of the underlying speech sources even when there are more sources than microphone observations
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it