Bibliographic record
Abstract
1. Introduction 1.1 The people, language, and history: an outline 1.2 Contemporary scholarship on nationalism and the study of Taiwanese nationalism 1.3 Dominated ethnic groups, nationalism and humanist intellectuals 1.4 Cultural nationalism and political nationalism 1.5 The politics of cultural uniqueness 1.6 Modernization ideology and cultural nationalism 1.7 The question of dissemination channels 1.8 The organization of the book 2. Japanese colonialism and literary and linguistic reforms in colonial Taiwan 2.1 Japanese colonialism and Taiwanese resistance in the 1920s 2.2 Japanese linguistic assimilationism 2.3 Literary and linguistic reforms in colonial Taiwan 2.4 Conclusion 3. Postwar linguistic problems, literary development, and the debate on Hsiang-t'u Literature 3.1 Early Mainlander-Taiwanese contact and the linguistic problem 3.2 Early KMT rule and the 2-28 incident 3.3 The 1947-49 literary discussion 3.4 KMT rule in the 1950s and 1960s 3.5 Combat literature, KMT ideology, and the development of modernist literature in the 1950s and 1960s 3.6 The debate on 'Hsiang-t'u' literature 3.7 Conclusion 4. Crafting a national literature 4.1 Native Taiwanese writers in the 1950s 4.2 The early history of Taiwan literature and Li Poetry Magazine 4.3 KMT rule and the rising of the Taiwanese opposition movement in the 1970s 4.4 The debate on Taiwanese consciousness and 'Hsiang-t'u' literature 4.5 Ch'en Ying-Chen, Yeh Shih-T'ao, and 'Hsiang-t'u' literature: 'pro-China' versus 'pro-Taiwan' 4.6 'De-Sinocizing' Taiwanese literature: the first half of the 1980s 4.7 Political changes since 1986 4.8 Crafting a national culture: the second half of the 1980s and after 4.9 Crafting a national literature 4.10 Conclusion 5. Crafting a national language 5.1 The official language policy and its consequences 5.2 Crafting a national language 5.3 The Hoklo writing system and Taiwanese nationalism 5.4 Hoklo literature and Taiwanese literature redefined: bringing language in 5.5 Conclusion 6. Crafting a national history 6.1 KMT rule and the pro-China view of history 6.2 The development of the pro-Taiwan view of history and Taiwanese nationalism 6.3 Conclusion 7. Conclusion 7.1 Taiwanese nationalism as an historical 'latecomer' 7.2 Taiwanese cultural nationalism reconsidered
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.008 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".