MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2128443618 · doi:10.1016/j.jalz.2012.05.1510

P3‐287: When dementia is in the house

2012· article· en· W2128443618 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueAlzheimer s & Dementia · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicEducation Methods and Practices
Canadian institutionsCARE CanadaMcMaster UniversityCanadian Sleep SocietyDalhousie UniversityBaycrest Hospital
Fundersnot available
KeywordsThematic analysisDementiaFrontotemporal dementiaCoding (social sciences)Focus groupPsychologyGerontologyMedical educationDevelopmental psychologyMedicineQualitative researchSociologyDisease

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Children living at home with an early-onset dementia parent, especially if frontotemporal dementia, call for unique support, yet no educational materials have existed. On Nov. 15, 2011, we launched a website to address this need among adolescent caregivers. A total of 14 participants ranging in age from 11-18 years and covering an average of 3 years of hands-on caregiving connected to Skype for a semi-structured interview administered to small groups. A thematic analysis approach toward the transcripts identified themes through a coding scheme. Consultants from the Young Carers Initiative and McMaster University's Montessori Learning program for the aging then provided input re the emerging themes to shape web content. Focus group participants and other stakeholders then critiqued the beta version of the website before its launch.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.854
Threshold uncertainty score0.997

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.125
GPT teacher head0.414
Teacher spread0.289 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it