MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2128604088 · doi:10.1109/tsa.2003.818031

Incorporating the human hearing properties in the signal subspace approach for speech enhancement

2003· article· en· W2128604088 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Speech and Audio Processing · 2003
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicSpeech and Audio Processing
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSpeech recognitionSpeech enhancementComputer scienceSignal subspaceNoise (video)SpectrogramNoise reductionResidualColors of noiseSubspace topologyFilter (signal processing)Artificial intelligenceAlgorithmComputer vision

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The major drawback of most noise reduction methods in speech applications is the annoying residual noise known as musical noise. A potential solution to this artifact is the incorporation of a human hearing model in the suppression filter design. However, since the available models are usually developed in the frequency domain, it is not clear how they can be applied in the signal subspace approach for speech enhancement. In this paper, we present a Frequency to Eigendomain Transformation (FET) which permits to calculate a perceptually based eigenfilter. This filter yields an improved result where better shaping of the residual noise, from a perceptual perspective, is achieved. The proposed method can also be used with the general case of colored noise. Spectrogram illustrations and listening test results are given to show the superiority of the proposed method over the conventional signal subspace approach.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.816
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.045
GPT teacher head0.265
Teacher spread0.219 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it