MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2128716617 · doi:10.1109/milcom.1995.483654

Modulation identification by the wavelet transform

2002· article· en· W2128716617 on OpenAlexaff
K. C. Ho, W. Prokopiw, Y.T. Chan

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicWireless Signal Modulation Classification
Canadian institutionsRoyal Military College of Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFrequency-shift keyingComputer scienceModulation (music)DemodulationIdentification (biology)Wavelet transformDiscrete wavelet transformWaveletSIGNAL (programming language)Stationary wavelet transformWavelet packet decompositionPattern recognition (psychology)Electronic engineeringSpeech recognitionArtificial intelligenceTelecommunicationsEngineeringAcousticsChannel (broadcasting)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

There is a need, for example in surveillance of the radio spectrum, to determine the modulation type of a received signal. By knowing the modulation type, one can demodulate the incoming signal for useful information. This paper proposes the use of wavelet transform for the identification problem. Application of wavelet transform on a digital modulation signal results in distinctive patterns for different types, which enables simple processing for identification. Three identifiers for classifying PSK and FSK, M-ary PSK, and M-ary FSK are considered and the relevant statistics for optimum decision making are included. Simulations are included for performance evaluation.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.006
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.006
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.028
GPT teacher head0.225
Teacher spread0.197 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations79
Published2002
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicWireless Signal Modulation ClassificationFrench-language works237,207