MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2128907450 · doi:10.1002/aic.690480507

Cycle detection and characterization in chemical engineering

2002· article· en· W2128907450 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueAIChE Journal · 2002
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEconomics, Econometrics and Finance
TopicComplex Systems and Time Series Analysis
Canadian institutionsWestern University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsStatisticSeries (stratigraphy)Biological systemFlow (mathematics)AmplitudeCharacterization (materials science)Process engineeringAlgorithmComputer scienceMechanicsMathematicsMaterials scienceEngineeringStatisticsPhysicsNanotechnology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Nonperiodic cycles occur in times series obtained in many chemical engineering applications. Variations in the cycle characteristics provide valuable information about the system in which the time series was measured. New methods are developed to detect cycles and determine their characteristics such as the cycle time, its regularity, the cycle strength, and the regularity of the cycle amplitude. These methods are thoroughly validated with both mathematically generated and experimental time series. The best detection method for nonperiodic cycles uses either the V statistic or, if it fails, the new, more sensitive, but more complex, P statistic. Cycle characteristics can be used to detect flow regime transitions in multiphase systems such as risers, gas‐solid, and gas‐liquid‐solid fluidized beds using signals from a variety of simple probes.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.653
Threshold uncertainty score0.478

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.161
Teacher spread0.147 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it