MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2128931238 · doi:10.1109/itw.2005.1531904

Estimation and decoding strategies for channels with abruptly changing statistics

2005· article· en· W2128931238 on OpenAlexaff
Wufei Zhang, Christian Koller, Andrew W. Eckford, Daniel J. Costello, Thomas E. Fuja, Gil I. Shamir

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicAlgorithms and Data Compression
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCrossoverDecoding methodsChannel (broadcasting)AlgorithmBinary symmetric channelCode wordPiecewiseComputer scienceBounded functionBinary numberMathematicsStatisticsChannel codeArtificial intelligenceTelecommunications

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper proposes iterative estimation and decoding techniques for memoryless channels with a bounded number of abrupt changes in channel statistics. Specifically, the channel under consideration is a binary symmetric channel with a crossover probability that changes a bounded number of times during the transmission of a codeword; the channel state information to be estimated consists of the crossover probabilities of the different segments and the location(s) of the transition point(s). To estimate the transition points, a technique developed for source coding of piecewise-stationary memoryless sources is adapted; then the expectation-maximization algorithm is used to estimate the crossover probabilities. This segmentation/estimation is carried out on the error sequence of the currently hypothesized frame. Simulation results using turbo codes indicate that the proposed receiver performs almost as well as a receiver that has perfect knowledge of the channel.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.007
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.007
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.271
Teacher spread0.254 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2005
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicAlgorithms and Data CompressionFrench-language works237,207