MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W212893361

Innovations of Human Resource Management in Lodging Industry/INNOVATION DU MANAGEMENT DES RESSOURCES HUMAINES DANS L'INDUSTRIE D'HÔTELLERIE

2007· article· fr· W212893361 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

venuePublished in a venue whose home country is Canada.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian social science · 2007
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicGlobal and Cross-Cultural Management
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHuman resource managementPolitical scienceCorporationManagementClanBusinessHumanitiesSociologyKnowledge managementPhilosophyEconomicsComputer science
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract: The role of the Human Resource Manager is evolving with the change in competitive market environment and it must be realized that that Human Resource Management must play a more strategic role in the success of an organization. A combined approach of literature review, periodical browsing, the application of Databases was used in this paper in order to analyze the changes of HRM in hotel industry. Firstly, the paper the challenges that hotel industry faced with and then, innovations related to HRM are put forward from the perspectives of managing diversity, improving motivation, building effective teamwork, managing change, balancing ethics and human resource management and linking the corporation culture with the strategy. That is the best way to be successful. Key words: human resource management, challenge, innovation Resume: Le role du directeur des ressources humaines evolue avec le changement de l'environnement competitif du marche et la connaissance que le management des ressources humaines doit jouer un role strategique clans le succes d'une organisation. Une approche synthetique combinant la retrospective des documents, la revue des periodiques, l'application des banques de donnees est utilisee dans le present article afin d'analyser le changement du management des ressources humaines dans l'industrie d'hotellerie. D'abord, l'auteur analyse les defis que l'hotel doit relever, et puis il propose des innovations relatives au management des ressources humaines dans les perspectives suivantes : diversite de management, motivation d'amelioration, construction d'une equipe de travail efficace, changement du management, equilibrage entre l'ethique et le management des ressources humaines et la liaison de la culture d'entreprise avec la strategie. Voila la meilleure voie d'acceder au succes. Mots-Cles: management des ressources humaines, defi, innovation 1. INTRODUCTION The renowned father of scientific management was Frederick W. Taylor, He studied worker efficiency and attempted to discover the one best way and the on fastest way to do a job. Whereas scientific management focused on the job and efficiencies, industrial psychology focused on the worker and individual differences. Hugo Munsterberg and his book Psychology and Industrial Efficiency initiated in 1913 the field of industrial psychology. Another early contributor to HRM was called the human relations movement. Harvard researchers, Elton Mayo and Fritz Roelthisberger, incorporated human factors into work. During the 1920s work on these analytical schemes expanded to encompass issues of appraising and training individuals, essentially for the same purposes. While the focus during the first quarter of the last century was on the individual employee, the second quarter was to see it shift to the group. Mayo's work at the Hawthorne plant focused on improving the productivity of individuals by experimenting with groups. Knowledge of groups and the impact of group on individuals advanced with the work of Lewin and Sherif and Sherif during the 1930s and into the 1940s. During the 1950s and 1960s much of the work concerned with managing individuals in organizations highlighted individual needs and motivation. Advances were made in selection and development. At this time, however, the more applied work in these areas related to managing and motivating individuals became the domain of those identifying primarily with personnel psychology and industrial and organizational psychology. The more theoretical work came under the new domain of organizational behaviourists. Untili the 1960s, the personnel function was considered to be concerned only with blue-collar or operating employees. Peter Drucker, a respected management scholar and consultant, made a statement about personnel management that reflected its blue-collar orientation. Drucker stated that the job of personnel was a file clerk's job, partly a housekeeping job, partly a social worker's job, and partly firefighting, heading off union trouble. …

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies
Consensus categoriesScience and technology studies
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.830
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.018
Science and technology studies0.0050.008
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.039
GPT teacher head0.316
Teacher spread0.277 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it